Review: The girl who kicked the hornets’ nest.

OK clench your buttcheeks people, this one was really fucking ridiculously stupid.

So stupid in fact I can just copy and paste it and it would be exactly like how I would parody it:

"I was captivated by The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
I was intrigued by The Girl who Played with Fire
I was disappointed and bored with The Girl who Kicked the Hornets’ Nest
Shame.
I was in fact so bored that I didn’t finish it, while I dislike leaving books unfinished I just couldn’t. I read about half of it, during which the main character lay in a hospital bed, talked to a lawyer once or twice and a woman changed jobs.
The main character’s father, is also in the hospital down the corridor, also not really doing much.
A shooting occurs, I assumed the story would pick up, but it didn’t.
I’m sure that some of you will disagree, say that the ending was the best, that it’s a fantastic end to the trilogy, but frankly nothing in the first half of the book inspired me to find out."

Just reflect on that. She calls this (yeah im breaking the fourth wall you cocksucking inebriated pedantic fucking cunts) a 'review':

re·view  

/riˈvyo͞o/

Noun A formal assessment or examination of something.

(Oh fuck, I just ate a watermelon flavoured skittle. Theyre horrible) Anyway, someone tell me where she was formally 'assessing' or 'examining' something, that something being this book. She said the first two were interesting, why didnt she develop on that?! Why didn't she use quotes to compare the excitement and dullness between the books?! I'm all for anyone writing reviews, but if you're going to do it, fucking do it properly. Be it Bastion, PrettyLights or Escape From Electric Mountain or even fucking Goatse, I don't care, just do it fucking right. Fuck off. Would you fuck a chick with a dick?